Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Watts v. Watts.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watts v. Watts Anchor | green | “grounded on the moral principle that one who has received a benefit has a duty to make restitution where retaining such a benefit would be unjust.” | 6 |
| 2 | Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc. | green | “(1) a benefit conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiff, (2) appreciation by the defendant of the fact of such benefit, and (3) acceptance and retention by the defendant of the benefit, under circumstances such that it would be inequitable to retain the benefit without payme…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.