Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cohen v. Cohen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cohen v. Cohen Anchor | green | “one continuous piece of litigation” | 4 |
| 2 | Sands v. Lefcourt Realty Corporation | green | “all corporations doing business in this state, except banks, savings institutions and loan associations, are subject to the operations of the attachment laws of this state, as provided in case of individuals.” | 3 |
| 3 | duPont v. duPont | green | “although a trust is a spendthrift trust or a trust for support, the interest of the beneficiary can be reached in satisfaction of an enforceable claim against the beneficiary, (a) by the wife or child of the beneficiary for support, or by the wife for alimony.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.