Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 90 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gonzaga University v. Doe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gonzaga University v. Doe Anchor | green | “where the text and structure of a statute provide no indication that congress intends to create new individual rights, there is no basis for a private suit, whether under 1983 or under an implied right of action.” | 44 |
| 2 | Blessing v. Freestone | green | “in order to seek redress through 1983, ... a plaintiff must assert the violation of a federal right, not merely a violation of federal law.” | 24 |
| 3 | Blessing v. Freestone | green | “a plaintiff must assert the violation of a federal right, not merely a violation of federal law.” | 19 |
| 4 | Albert Zucker Sarah Mandelbaum, Weiss & Yourman Stull, Stull & Brody v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation Ray Irani Howard Collins, Walter Kaufmann | green | “no article iii case or controversy is needed with regard to attorneys' fees as such, because they are but an ancillary matter” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.