Topic: he or she then must satisfy one of the six specific section… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #3546

11 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 90 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Werner v. Carbo.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Werner v. Carbo Anchor
ca4 · 1984
green “he or she then must satisfy one of the six specific sections of rule 60(b).” 23
2 Lester C. McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated
ca4 · 1991
green “we have held on several occasions that a rule 60(b) motion is not timely brought when it is made three to four months after the original judgment and no valid reason is given for the delay.” 17
3 Cnf Constructors, Incorporated v. Donohoe Construction Company, a Division of the Donohoe Companies, Incorporated
ca4 · 1995
green “reconsideration of legal issues already addressed in an earlier ruling.” 13
4 Aikens v. Ingram
ca4 · 2011
green “must make a threshold showing of timeliness, 'a meritorious claim or defense,' and lack of unfair prejudice to the opposing party.” 9
5 Lester C. McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated
ca4 · 1991
green “held on several occasions that a rule 60(b) motion is not timely brought when it is made three to four months after the original judgment and no valid reason is given for the delay.” 7
6 Ronald W. Dowell, Administrator of the Estate of Jackie Lynn Dowell, Deceased v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Automobile Insurance Company
ca4 · 1993
green “therefore, before a party may seek relief under rule 60(b), a party first must show 'timeliness, a meritorious claim, and a lack of unfair prejudice to the opposing party.” 5
7 Werner v. Carbo
ca4 · 1984
green “after a party has crossed this initial threshold, he then must satisfy one of the six specific sections of rule 60(b).” 4
8 Lester C. McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated
ca4 · 1991
green “a rule 60(b) motion is not timely brought when it is made three to four months after the original judgment and no valid reason is given for the delay.” 3
9 Davis v. Kelley
ca8 · 2017
green “has failed to present extraordinary circumstances mirroring those demonstrated in buck.” 3
10 Ferguson v. United States
ncwd · 1999
green “to permit the district court to correct an erroneous judgment and thereby avoid the necessity of an appeal,” 3
11 Holland v. Virginia Lee Co.
vawd · 1999
green “is merely the outer limit within which such motion may be presented” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check