Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maso v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO TAXATION.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maso v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO TAXATION Anchor | green | “where circumstances are such that a reasonably prudent person should make inquiries, that person is charged with knowledge of the facts reasonable inquiry would have revealed.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Gonzalez | green | “was not sufficient to instruct the jury that defendant's knowledge of the cocaine he brought into the detention center is an essential element of the crime of bringing contraband into a jail” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Kent | green | “whether direct or circumstantial substantial evidence exists and supports a verdict of guilt beyond a reasonable 20 doubt with respect to every element essential for conviction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.