Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Holt v. Hobbs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holt v. Hobbs Anchor | green | “if a less restrictive means is available for the government to achieve its goals, the government must use it.” | 7 |
| 2 | Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. | green | “it is important to confirm that a premise of the court's opinion is its assumption that the hhs regulation here at issue furthers a legitimate and compelling interest in the health of female employees.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.