Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SM Kids, LLC v. Google LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SM Kids, LLC v. Google LLC Anchor | green | “article iii, section 2 of the constitution limits the subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal courts to 'cases' and 'controversies.” | 7 |
| 2 | Magee v. Nassau County Medical Center | green | “a federal court generally may not rule on the merits of a case without first determining that it has jurisdiction over the category of claim in suit (i.e., subject-matter jurisdiction)” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.