Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michael Radogna v. Williams Twp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael Radogna v. Williams Twp Anchor | green | “routinely adhere to the general rule prohibiting pro se plaintiffs from pursuing claims on behalf of others in a representative capacity.” | 5 |
| 2 | Am. Orthopedic & Sports Med. v. Independence Blue Cross Blue Shield | green | “does not transfer an ownership interest in the claim' but simply confers on the agent the authority to act on behalf of the principal.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.