Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Kunco.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Kunco Anchor | green | “if there is any basis to support it, even if this court relies on different grounds to affirm.” | 4 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Walsh | green | “if there is any basis to support it, even if this court relies on different grounds to affirm.” | 3 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Kunco | green | “permits us to consider only whether the pcra court's determination is supported by the evidence of record and whether it is free from legal error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.