Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People ex rel. Bennett v. Khahaifa.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People ex rel. Bennett v. Khahaifa Anchor | green | “if petitioner establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been noncompliance with any of the terms of the suspended judgment, the court may revoke the suspended judgment and terminate parental rights” | 4 |
| 2 | In re Danielle M. | green | “appeared at and participated in the hearing” | 3 |
| 3 | Erie County Department of Social Services ex rel. Wiser v. Thompson | green | “a party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.