Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance Society.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance Society Anchor | green | “both actual and punitive 20 damages . . . must be considered to the extent claimed in determining jurisdictional 21 amount,” | 3 |
| 2 | Morris v. Hotel Riviera, Inc. | green | “an estimate of the amount in controversy must be reduced if 'a 9 specific rule of law or measure of damages limits the amount of damages recoverable,” | 3 |
| 3 | Orichian v. BMW of North America, LLC | green | “the purchase price paid by the buyer, 15 less that amount directly attributable to use by the buyer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.