Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bolling.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bolling Anchor | green | “and not reviewable unless the district attorney acts with bad faith to deprive a defendant of his or her right to a fair trial” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Broadnax | green | “could have been produced at trial with the exercise of due diligence, and it was not of 'such character as to create a probability that had such evidence been received at the trial the verdict would have been favorable to the defendant” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Callicut | green | “when he refused to request that the witness be granted immunity from prosecution” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.