Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from First Savings Bank v. U.S. Bancorp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First Savings Bank v. U.S. Bancorp Anchor | green | “this discretionary approach of the federal rules fosters a full adjudication of the merits of the parties' disputes within a single comprehensive proceeding.” | 5 |
| 2 | Katzman v. Sessions | green | “promote as complete an adjudication of the dispute between the parties as is possible.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.