Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bauer v. Shepard.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bauer v. Shepard Anchor | green | “the state's supreme court could remove the judge from office or impose substantial disci pline.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bauer v. Shepard | green | “commission brings a proceeding the state judiciary will issue an opinion that makes the rule more con crete.” | 3 |
| 3 | Trs. of Ind. Univ. v. Prosecutor of Marion Cnty. Ind. | neutral | “a person who intentionally acquires, receives, sells, or transfers fetal tissue commits unlawful transfer of fetal tissue, a level 5 felony.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.