Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gateway Co. v. DiNoia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gateway Co. v. DiNoia Anchor | green | “our review is plenary and we must decide whether the trial court's conclusions are legally and logically correct and find support in the facts that appear in the record.” | 5 |
| 2 | Avon Meadow Condominium Ass'n v. Bank of Boston Connecticut | green | “on appeal, we must decide whether the trial court erred in determining that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.