Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French Smith Anchor | green | “is limited to determining whether there has been an exercise of administrative discretion and whether the manner of exercise has been arbitrary or capricious.” | 6 |
| 2 | Gbaya v. United States Attorney General | green | “the bia has discretion to deny a motion to reopen even if the party moving has made out a prima facie case for relief.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.