Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp Anchor | green | “all issues raised by the appellants are inextricably intertwined.” | 3 |
| 2 | Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc. v. Geren | green | “would involve substantial effects on project purposes and major operational changes.” | 3 |
| 3 | Alabama v. United States Army Corps of Engineers | green | “execute any contracts or agreements which are the subject of the complaint in this action unless expressly agreed to, in writing, by alabama and florida.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.