Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from MacGregor v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacGregor v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. Anchor | green | “in the absence of such guidance from michigan state courts, we shall leave undisturbed the interpretation placed upon purely local law by a michigan federal judge of long experience and by three circuit court judges whose circuit includes michigan.” | 3 |
| 2 | Karen Ann Klempka v. G.D. Searle and Company, a Delaware Corporation | green | “(1) a cognizable physical manifestation of the disease or injury, and (2) evidence of a causal connection between the injury or disease and the defendant's product, act, or omission.” | 3 |
| 3 | Moyer v. United Dominion Industries, Inc. | green | “lay persons should not be charged with greater knowledge of their physical condition than that possessed by the physicians on whose advice they must rely.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.