Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service Commission Anchor | green | “other sales, that is, to direct sales for consumptive use.” | 3 |
| 2 | Electric Power Supply Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “action that would violate state laws or regulations.” | 3 |
| 3 | Electric Power Supply Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | green | “comparable contributions could be the reason for equal compensation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.