Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from T.S. v. Independent School District No. 54.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T.S. v. Independent School District No. 54 Anchor | green | “once a student has graduated, he is no longer entitled to a fape; thus any claim that a fape was deficient becomes moot upon a valid graduation.” | 3 |
| 2 | Taxpayers For The Animas-La Plata Referendum v. Animas-La Plata Water Conservancy District | green | “by definition claims for past damages cannot be moot.” | 3 |
| 3 | Board of Education of Oak Park & River Forest High School District 200 v. Nathan R., by and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Richard and Nancy R. | green | “once a student has graduated, he is no longer entitled to a fape; thus any claim that a fape was deficient becomes moot upon a valid graduation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.