Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Federal Communications Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Federal Communications Commission Anchor | green | “concluded that providing the enhanced support to lifeline providers deploying, building, and maintaining critical last mile infrastructure is a more appropriate way to support the expansion of voice- and broadband-capable networks on tribal lands.” | 3 |
| 2 | Chamber Cmerc USA v. SEC | green | “neither frivolous nor out of bounds.” | 3 |
| 3 | Covad Communications Co. v. Federal Communications Commission | green | “the affected party 'should have anticipated' the agency's final course in light of the initial notice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.