2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Durell v. Sharp Healthcare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durell v. Sharp Healthcare Anchor | green | “there is no cause of action in california for unjust enrichment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Moiser v. Southern California Physicians Ins. Exchange | green | “the elements of a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty are: (1) the existence of a fiduciary duty; (2) the breach of that duty; and (3) damage proximately caused by that breach.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.