2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weddell v. H2O, INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weddell v. H2O, INC. Anchor | green | “the doctrine of lis pendens provides constructive notice to the world that a dispute involving real property is ongoing.” | 4 |
| 2 | Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Restaurant | green | “conversion is a distinct act of dominion wrongfully exerted over personal property.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.