Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Matter of Floyd Raymond Woods, Bankrupt. Appeal of Judith Jean Crabb, Objecting.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Matter of Floyd Raymond Woods, Bankrupt. Appeal of Judith Jean Crabb, Objecting Anchor | green | “it is the basis for creation of the obligation which determines whether it was intended as an equalization of property rights or as support and maintenance.” | 5 |
| 2 | Carroll v. Carroll (In Re Carroll) | green | “discharging this obligation would simply provide debtor with additional disposable income to 'use at his discretion.' this is not the type of benefit that 523(a)(15)(b) sought to protect.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.