Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kelly v. Merrill Lynch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelly v. Merrill Lynch Anchor | green | “a party can waive res judicata by consenting to split the claim into two suits.” | 5 |
| 2 | California v. Randtron | green | “would not have approved the consent decree or made a finding that the settlement was reached in good faith had the settlement freed randtron and all of its insurers from any further liability upon the exhaustion of only the two wausau policies.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.