Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Gates v. Victor Fine Foods.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Gates v. Victor Fine Foods Anchor | green | “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” | 4 |
| 2 | Lenwood Williams, Jr. v. The Shipping Corporation of India | green | “we think it is manifestly clear that in 1791 a suit against a foreign government could not be maintained in either the courts of america or england.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gardiner Stone Hunter v. Iberia Lineas Aereas | green | “foreign state or political subdivision thereof.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.