Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ina of Texas v. John G. Richard, D/B/A Restless Towing Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ina of Texas v. John G. Richard, D/B/A Restless Towing Company Anchor | green | “having held that state law controls the interpretation of marine insurance policies, it would defy both logic and sound policy were we to hold that the applicability of attorney's fees vel non must be determined by reference to uniform federal law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Ina of Texas v. John G. Richard, D/B/A Restless Towing Company | green | “there is no specific and controlling federal rule of law relating to attorney's fees in maritime insurance litigation.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bitterman v. Bitterman | green | “the ability to collect attorney's fees from an opposing party, as well as the obligation to pay such fees, is substantive in nature.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.