Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 400 v. Marval Poultry Company, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 400 v. Marval Poultry Company, Incorporated Anchor | green | “a party to arbitration cannot voluntarily engage in the arbitration of the issues submitted to the arbitrator and then attack the award on grounds not raised before the arbitrator.” | 5 |
| 2 | In the Matter of the New York Stock Exchange Arbitration Between, Fahnestock & Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Joseph J. Waltman, Cross-Appellant | green | “if a ground for the arbitrator's decision can be inferred from the facts of the case, the award should be confirmed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.