Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rufus West v. Dylon Radtke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rufus West v. Dylon Radtke Anchor | green | “provides that a federally funded prison may not 'impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise' of an inmate unless it can prove that doing so is the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental interest.” | 5 |
| 2 | Jerry Charles v. Richard J. Verhagen and Matthew J. Frank, and United States of America, Intervenor | green | “may sue for injunctive or declaratory relief.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.