Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 88 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maryanne Grande v. Saint Clare’s Health System (076606) (Morris County and Statewide).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maryanne Grande v. Saint Clare’s Health System (076606) (Morris County and Statewide) Anchor | green | “an issue of material fact is 'genuine only if, considering the burden of persuasion at trial, the evidence submitted by the parties on the motion, together with all legitimate inferences therefrom favoring the non-moving party, would require submission of the issue to the trier …” | 45 |
| 2 | Maryanne Grande v. Saint Clare’s Health System (076606) (Morris County and Statewide) | green | “the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.” | 27 |
| 3 | Estate of Narleski v. Gomes | green | “the benefit of the most favorable evidence and most favorable inferences drawn from that evidence.” | 10 |
| 4 | Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc. | green | “remains with the employee at all times.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.