Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 88 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lm v. Ddf.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lm v. Ddf Anchor | green | “evidence that, when weighed against evidence in opposition, will produce in the mind of the trier of fact a firm conviction as to each essential element of the claim and a high probability as to the correctness of the conclusion.” | 40 |
| 2 | K.S.B. v. M.C.B. | green | “this court does not reweigh the evidence but, rather, determines whether the findings of fact made by the juvenile court are supported by evidence that the juvenile court could have found to be clear and convincing.” | 14 |
| 3 | Owens v. Owens | green | “it is a well established rule that, with limited exceptions, an appeal will lie only from a final judgment which determines the issues before the court and ascertains and declares the rights of the parties involved.” | 13 |
| 4 | Talladega Cty. Dep. of Human Res. v. Mep | green | “children ... deserve a permanent placement instead of continued foster placement for a year or more while awaiting their parents' possible, but not certain, rehabilitation” | 6 |
| 5 | T.D.K. v. L.A.W. and T.M. | green | “if some less drastic alternative to termination of parental rights can be used that will simultaneously protect the children from parental harm and preserve the beneficial aspects of the family relationship, then a juvenile 41 cl-2023-0033; cl-2023-0034; cl-2023-0035; cl-2023-00…” | 6 |
| 6 | T.D.K. v. L.A.W. and T.M. | green | “in order for the juvenile court to consider whether a special-needs child will likely achieve permanency through adoption, it is incumbent upon dhr to present clear and convincing evidence of the viability of adoption so that the juvenile court can make an informed evaluation an…” | 6 |
| 7 | Owens v. Owens | green | “this court has previously stated: " ' " 'it is a well established rule that, with limited exceptions, an appeal will lie only from a final judgment which determines the issues before the court and ascertains and declares the rights of the parties involved.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.