Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. Anchor | green | “the burden of persuasion at trial would be on the non-moving party . . . the party moving for summary judgment may satisfy his burden of production under rule 56 in either of two ways: (1) by submitting evidence that negates an essential element of the non-moving party's claim, …” | 5 |
| 2 | Anthony Sutera v. Schering Corporation | green | “the district court must draw all reasonable inferences and resolve all ambiguities in favor of the nonmoving party and grant summary judgment only if no reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the nonmoving party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.