Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin Anchor | green | “must provide standards of competency.” | 3 |
| 2 | Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin | green | “statute, rule of its court of last resort, or by another agency authorized by state law,” | 3 |
| 3 | Ashmus v. Calderon | green | “california may not take advantage of the six-month limitations period when it takes years to appoint counsel.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.