Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harold E. Bailey, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harold E. Bailey, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs Anchor | green | “likewise, section 7266 does not provide its own exceptions to the general rule.” | 3 |
| 2 | Joseph Osler Brice and Laurajean Councill Brice, on Behalf of Their Son, Joseph Tilghman Brice v. Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “part of a detailed statutory scheme which includes other strict deadlines” | 3 |
| 3 | Joseph Osler Brice and Laurajean Councill Brice, on Behalf of Their Son, Joseph Tilghman Brice v. Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “the act includes a specific exception from the limitations period for a petition improperly filed in state or federal court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.