2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Allison v. McGhan Medical Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allison v. McGhan Medical Corp. Anchor | green | “factors which this and other courts have considered in the daubert analysis are reliance on anecdotal evidence (as in case reports)...” | 3 |
| 2 | Woienski v. United Airlines, Inc. | green | “an expert is permitted to form conclusions by extrapolating from existing data.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.