Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Anchor | green | “we review de novo the bia's determination of questions of law, except to the extent that deference is owed to its interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations.” | 6 |
| 2 | Penuliar v. Mukasey | green | “full range of conduct covered by” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.