Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sandra Charnetski v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sandra Charnetski v. United States Anchor | green | “relationship with the government cannot be simultaneously governed by both an appointment and a contract.” | 3 |
| 2 | Anderson v. United States | green | “the law is clear on this point: the plaintiffs cannot be both government employees and contractual employees; the two are mutually exclusive.” | 3 |
| 3 | Anderson v. United States | green | “this proposition has been repeatedly rejected both by the federal circuit and the court of federal claims.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.