Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Hector C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Hector C. Anchor | green | “terminating parental rights implicates rights of fundamental importance.” | 6 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Marlene C. | green | “icwa is a remedial statute in that it was enacted to stem the alarmingly high percentage of indian families being separated by removal of children through custody proceedings,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.