Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 87 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav. Anchor | green | “is not to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 53 |
| 2 | Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav. | green | “is not . . . to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 10 |
| 3 | Debra Horta v. Charles B. Sullivan | green | “are insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact,” | 7 |
| 4 | Stephen N. Roth, M.D. v. Lutheran General Hospital, Jerome Kraut, M.D., Seymour Metrick, M.D. | green | “the inquiry is an individualized one, and must be determined on a case-by-case basis.” | 5 |
| 5 | Lydia Libertad v. Father Patrick Welch | green | “the evidence illustrating the factual controversy cannot be conjectural or problematic; it must have substance in the sense that it limns differing versions of the truth which a factfinder must resolve . . . .” | 4 |
| 6 | Rachel L. FENNELL, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FIRST STEP DESIGNS, LTD, D/B/A Hand-In-Hand, Defendant, Appellee | green | “articulate a legitimate, nonretaliatory reason for its employment decision.” | 4 |
| 7 | Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav. | green | “weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.