Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 87 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Henry v. Rahway State Prison.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henry v. Rahway State Prison Anchor | green | “arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable or it is not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record as a whole.” | 29 |
| 2 | Brunetti v. Borough of New Milford | green | “wide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge.” | 16 |
| 3 | Henry v. Rahway State Prison | green | “by substantial credible evidence in the record as a whole.” | 14 |
| 4 | Henry v. Rahway State Prison | green | “substantial credible evidence in the record as a whole.” | 14 |
| 5 | Ramirez v. Department of Corrections | green | “an appellate court ordinarily will reverse the decision of an administrative agency only when the agency's decision is 'arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable or is not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record as a whole.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.