Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Woods.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Woods Anchor | green | “look at the indictment or other charging papers to determine” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Templeton | green | “it is possible to violate wis. stat. 946.42 in a manner that constitutes a crime of violence under 4b1.1, and possible to do so in a way that does not.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Smith | green | “we consider the offense generically; we may not inquire into the specific conduct of a particular offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.