Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Virginia Real Estate Board v. Clay.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virginia Real Estate Board v. Clay Anchor | green | “courts should give the fullest possible effect to the legislative intent embodied in the entire statutory enactment.” | 5 |
| 2 | ACB Trucking, Inc. v. Griffin | green | “two statutes which are closely interrelated must be read and construed together and effect given to all of their provisions.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.