Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thompson v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thompson v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “test for determining whether a juror should be stricken for cause is 'whether ... the prospective juror can conform his views to the requirements of the law and render a fair and impartial verdict.” | 3 |
| 2 | King v. Commonwealth | green | “if the defendant had to use all of his peremptory strikes to remove a juror that should have been stricken for cause, a juror that he otherwise would have stricken would have been impaneled on the jury.” | 3 |
| 3 | Smith v. Commonwealth | green | “rcr 9.36(1) provides that the trial judge shall excuse a juror for cause when there is reasonable ground to believe that the prospective juror cannot render a fair and impartial verdict.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.