2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maryland v. Wirtz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maryland v. Wirtz Anchor | red | “we are not concerned with the manner in which congress reached its factual conclusions.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr. | green | “practically speaking, findings almost always end the matter.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.