Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kachurak v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kachurak v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing Anchor | green | “reasonable grounds exist when a person in the position of the police officer, viewing the facts and circumstances as they appeared at the time, could have concluded that the motorist was operating the vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Dreisbach | green | “an officer's belief that a licensee was operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance must only be objective in light of the surrounding circumstances.” | 3 |
| 3 | Demarchis v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing | green | “an officer's belief that a licensee was operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance must only be objective in light of the surrounding circumstances.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.