Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of El Paso v. Pub. Utility Com'n of Texas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of El Paso v. Pub. Utility Com'n of Texas Anchor | green | “the question of whether to reopen an administrative record to allow additional evidence is one addressed to the discretion of the administrative body.” | 3 |
| 2 | Lee v. City of Houston | green | “any stranded costs in excess of 5 billion that remain uncollected at the time the statewide total is calculated.” | 3 |
| 3 | Meier Infiniti Co. v. Motor Vehicle Board | green | “on matters involving the agency's administrative docket are within the discretionary control of the hearing officer” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.