Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. Fluellen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. Fluellen Anchor | green | “the defendant still retains the right to demand a speedy trial within sixty days.” | 3 |
| 2 | Henderson v. State | green | “because the trial court erred in admitting the double hearsay testimony as substantive evidence, the trial court also erred in denying the defense's request for a limiting instruction.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gosciminski v. State | green | “hearsay' is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.