Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reier v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reier v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation Anchor | green | “illogical, unreasonable, or inconsistent with common sense.” | 3 |
| 2 | Bell & Bon Secours v. Chance | green | “finally, we check our interpretation against the consequences of alternative readings of the text.” | 3 |
| 3 | Nationstar Mortgage v. Kemp | green | “review of the text does not merely entail putting the words under the microscope by themselves with a dictionary at hand, because words that appear clear and unambiguous when viewed in isolation may become ambiguous when read as part of a larger statutory scheme.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.