Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wise v. Lincoln Logs Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wise v. Lincoln Logs Ltd. Anchor | green | “invoke the federal court's diversity jurisdiction by contending that the non-diverse defendant or defendants were not properly joined as defendants in state court.” | 3 |
| 2 | Wise v. Lincoln Logs Ltd. | green | “may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the state in which such action is brought.” | 3 |
| 3 | Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC | green | “while courts in this circuit have applied varying formulations of the standard for fraudulent joinder, . . . analysis of the cases shows that, in substance, the courts are applying the 'no possibility' standard set forth in pampillonia, see 138 f.3d at 461 , which is the standar…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.