Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 86 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michael J. Thieme v. Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme(076683).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael J. Thieme v. Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme(076683) Anchor | green | “we review the family part judge's findings in accordance with a deferential standard of review, recognizing the court's 'special jurisdiction and expertise in family matters.” | 28 |
| 2 | J.B. v. W.B. | green | “when reviewing decisions granting or denying applications to modify child support, we examine whether, given the facts, the trial judge abused his or her discretion.” | 17 |
| 3 | Milne v. Goldenberg | green | “we accord great deference to discretionary decisions of family part judges.” | 11 |
| 4 | Michael J. Thieme v. Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme(076683) | green | “review the family part judge's findings in accordance with a deferential standard of review, recognizing the court's 'special jurisdiction and expertise in family matters.” | 9 |
| 5 | Michael J. Thieme v. Bernice F. Aucoin-Thieme(076683) | green | “special jurisdiction and expertise in family matters.” | 9 |
| 6 | Jacoby v. Jacoby | green | “the trial court's 'award will not be disturbed unless it is manifestly unreasonable, arbitrary, or clearly contrary to reason or to other evidence, or the result of whim or caprice.” | 7 |
| 7 | New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency v. A.B. | green | “indeed, we defer to family part judges 'unless they are so wide of the mark that our intervention is required to avert an injustice.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.